Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/08/26/03:30:45
Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il) wrote:
: On Sun, 23 Aug 1998, Endlisnis wrote:
: > Is it faster (under Win95) to call 'literal int' than dpmi_int?
: The answer (as always with Microsoft) is probably ``it depends''. It
: probably depends on which function of what iterrupt do you invoke like
: this. I could easily imagine that some functions would be faster if
: invoked via __dpmi_int, since at least some of the thunking layers
: (through which Windows goes while processing real-mode interrupts) are
: bypassed.
You can set up a DOS window on Windoze95 so it will automatically close
on program exit. So, if you make a shortcut to your DOS program, just go
to the shortcut's properties screen and choose that option. (I'm not at
a Windoze box right now or I'd give you exact details on how to get
there. sorry.)
Fred
--
---- Fred Smith -- fredex AT fcshome DOT stoneham DOT ma DOT us -----------------------------
For the wages of sin is death,
but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord
------------------------------ Romans 6:23 (niv) ------------------------------
- Raw text -