Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/08/25/07:40:55
On Sun, 23 Aug 1998, Endlisnis wrote:
> Is it faster (under Win95) to call 'literal int' than dpmi_int?
The answer (as always with Microsoft) is probably ``it depends''. It
probably depends on which function of what iterrupt do you invoke like
this. I could easily imagine that some functions would be faster if
invoked via __dpmi_int, since at least some of the thunking layers
(through which Windows goes while processing real-mode interrupts) are
bypassed.
But I really don't know, since I never tried to time these.
Personally, I usually prefer to call __dpmi_int in all cases, for the
reason that it is safer.
- Raw text -