Date:	Sun, 2 Aug 1998 17:53:23 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To:	Ralph Proctor <ralphgpr AT shadow DOT net>
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: MAN & INFO
In-Reply-To:	<3.0.1.16.19980802104315.2327c8ce@shadow.net>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.980802175129.13566B-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Sun, 2 Aug 1998, Ralph Proctor wrote:

> What is still curious is that not all man files have the man
> extension--true or false?

Most man pages do NOT have .man extension.  They usually have extensions 
like .1 or .1x where x is a single letter.

The man clone you are using is rather loose about the extension, unless 
you invoke it with a specific section number (like "man 3 foo").

- Raw text -