delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | "John S. Fine" <johnfine AT erols DOT com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: Inline assembly |
Date: | Thu, 30 Jul 1998 10:45:45 -0400 |
Organization: | RCN Internet |
Lines: | 21 |
Message-ID: | <35C08719.561B@erols.com> |
References: | <01bdbb47$fdb4d240$0100007f AT localhost> |
Reply-To: | johnfine AT erols DOT com |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | 207-172-241-202.s11.as8.bsd.erols.com |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Austin Clements wrote: > Is there any way to do inline assembly in DJGPP and not > have to resort to writing full-fledged assembly? (I've looked at .s files > before and wished I hadn't) If you didn't like what you saw in .s files, you probably won't like inline assembly either. If good documentation would help, look at: http://www.rt66.com/~brennan/djgpp/bgtia.html If you don't like AT&T syntax and prefer Intel syntax, you should look at NASM instead (see my webpage). With NASM you would need to write whole .asm files (rather than inline), but the sytax is cleaner and linking with djgpp C code is fairly well documented. -- http://www.erols.com/johnfine/ http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Peaks/8600/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |