Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/07/22/06:45:25
JP Morris (jmorris AT calderauk DOT com) wrote:
> It's difficult to recompile the thing in pure DOS, you'll need a very
> good DPMI server. If you work in a win95 DOS box, that should be ok.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Isn't this a contradiction;-? Or do you mean a DPMI server that doesn't
care to much about de-referencing NULL-pointers? (which IMHO isn't a
_good_ DPMI server)
If you have reasons why win95-dos-box is better than CWSDPMI, I would
be highly interested. (or what are the problems compiling midas?)
Greetings,
Robert.
PS. this is not intended as a flame, or a personal attack, but I would
really like to know why win95 is better. Hmmm, while thinking
about it, I use win95, even while I think it's worse than DOS in
most respects. (can't we just switch back to the C64 again ;-).
--
rjvdboon AT cs DOT vu DOT nl | "En dat is niet waar!" sprak (ex?) Staatsecre-
www.cs.vu.nl/~rjvdboon | taris Netelenbos (onderwijs) fel.
- Raw text -