Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/07/15/14:52:58
Hi,
thank you for your help,
>It depends where did your gxx.exe come from. If it's from gpp281b.zip,
>then I think it doesn't. gxx.exe from djdev201.zip (which is an entirely
>different program) *does* link in libgpp.
>
>Personally, I think it's *very* unfortunate that gpp281b.zip called
>another program by the same name gxx.exe. It confuses people, since the
>FAQ and README.1ST mention gxx.exe as well, but they mean gxx.exe from
>djdev201. I think gpp281b.zip should rename it to gpp.exe instead.
your interesting answer made me a little doubt, then I think that gxx from
gpp281b.zip overwrote the gxx from djdev201.zip; so, what about if I unzip
djdev201.zip again ? at this way I would compile with out -lgpp parameter,
isn't it ?
>This is explained in the FAQ (section 8.10): some functions are declared
>inline on the headers which define them, and don't have compiled versions
>inside the library. But inlining is disabled unless you use -O, so your
>program winds up without these functions, and the linker complains.
which one is better -O or -O2 ( or what is the difference ? ) ?
>Emacs isn't just an editor, it's a programming environment and a way of
>life ;-).
>> is it good ?
>Extremely good, and full of features.
I didn't understand it, then I will read more.
BIG thanks to you, your help was very useful.
jorge ivan meza martinez
http://members.xoom.com/THP
jimeza AT usa DOT net
-----Original Message-----
De: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Para: Jorge Ivan Meza Martinez <jimeza AT usa DOT net>
CC: djgpp AT delorie DOT com <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Fecha: Martes 14 de Julio de 1998 10:08 PM
Asunto: Re: Questions
- Raw text -