| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| From: | sparhawk AT eunet DOT at (Gerhard Gruber) |
| Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| Subject: | Re: "delete" and "delete []" operators |
| Date: | Thu, 09 Jul 1998 19:54:04 GMT |
| Organization: | Customer of EUnet Austria |
| Lines: | 29 |
| Message-ID: | <35ac1dc6.18799942@news.Austria.EU.net> |
| References: | <ivglrCA7V$o1Ew74 AT lwithers DOT demon DOT co DOT uk> <873ecbeyni DOT fsf AT hasn DOT dera DOT gov DOT uk> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host: | e016.dynamic.vienna.at.eu.net |
| Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
| To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Destination: Ian Miller <itmiller AT dera DOT gov DOT uk>
From: Gruber Gerhard
Group: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Date: 09 Jul 1998 18:12:49 +0100:
>> If I create an array like this:
>>
>> typedef char *cptr;
>> cptr x;
>> x = new char[15];
>>
>> Should I then, when I come to free the memory, use:
>>
>> delete x;
>> or
>> delete [] x;
>
>delete [] x;
Why? If have seen this delete[] in a few cases but I don't really know what
the difference is to the "normal" delete.
--
Bye,
Gerhard
email: sparhawk AT eunet DOT at
g DOT gruber AT sis DOT co DOT at
Spelling corrections are appreciated.
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |