From:	sparhawk AT eunet DOT at (Gerhard Gruber)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: This is not a problem but...
Date:	Wed, 01 Jul 1998 21:26:45 GMT
Organization:	Customer of EUnet Austria
Lines:	23
Message-ID:	<359da91c.22748421@news.Austria.EU.net>
References:	<001b01bda51b$082b5700$624d08c3 AT arthur>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	e205.dynamic.vienna.at.eu.net
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Destination: "Arthur" <arfa AT clara DOT net>
From: Gruber Gerhard
Group: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 1998 17:17:22 +0100:

>True, but I was thinking strictly theoretically. In practice (especially
>with my UDMA Hard Disc with onboard cache) loading the compressed file would
>be slower. But think: how much of a speed overhead does compression have? On
>my ST, uncompressing a 2MB zipped file takes several minutes. On a DX2/66 it
>takes a matter of seconds. Why don't more people use data compression?

I do. The (theoretical) speed differences are so minimal on my machine that I
rather safe diskspace instead of buying new disks. I just downloaded dlp after
it was mentioned here and I'm absolutely hillarious(is this the word?) about
it. :) I already packed most of my GNU/BIN directory and it saved about 55%.
--
Bye,
   Gerhard

email: sparhawk AT eunet DOT at
       g DOT gruber AT sis DOT co DOT at

Spelling corrections are appreciated.

- Raw text -