delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | yorka AT dlc DOT fi (aYk) |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: Fixed vs floating point? |
Date: | Fri, 19 Jun 1998 19:30:15 GMT |
Organization: | Majik |
Lines: | 16 |
Message-ID: | <358abc1c.444781@news.dlc.fi> |
References: | <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 96 DOT 980619100615 DOT 14404A-100000 AT xs2 DOT xs4all DOT nl> <358b607b DOT 591980 AT news DOT dlc DOT fi> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | kou87.pp.dlc.fi |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
On Fri, 19 Jun 1998 12:59:31 GMT, yorka AT dlc DOT fi (aYk) wrote: OOPS, I misinterpreted your question. - aYk - >No. The FPU is separate from the standard ALUs. > >- aYk - > >>Can anyone make a guess if multiplications/devisions in fixed point math >>are still faster on a machine that has a FPU? I was wondering if it would >>do any good to #define my code to use conventional floats if the machine >>supports it. (I'm using Allegro's fixed math stuff b.t.w) >>
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |