From:	ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se (Martin Str|mberg)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Turbo Assembler & DJGPP
Date:	13 Jun 1998 17:28:20 GMT
Organization:	University of Lulea, Sweden
Lines:	24
Message-ID:	<6lucrk$sjb$2@news.luth.se>
References:	<199806131905140640 DOT 00ADCEB7 AT pogwizd DOT tcs DOT uni DOT wroc DOT pl>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	my21.sm.luth.se
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Pawel Kowalski (pk AT tcs DOT uni DOT wroc DOT pl) wrote:
: What about NASM? Is it worth downloading? Is it possible to
: write something like this in NASM:
: 
: extern ___djgpp_ds_alias
: 
: and compile it to coff, then link it along with a djgpp program?
: Is NASM better than GAS?

Now, take what I say with a pinch of salt, as I've never used it. I
think people use it successfully. And as I think it does understand
Intel syntax and can generate coff, I think this is exactly what you
need.

Well it depends what you want to use it for: for your code in Intel
syntax, it's better than gas; for code generated by gcc gas is
probably better. Yes?

Verify what I've said before you decide, as I've never used it.


Throwing Muses, Red Heaven,

							MartinS

- Raw text -