Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/05/13/23:01:06
Eli Zaretskii wrote in message ...
>> I am trying to make a 3d engine which needs bottleneck speed. Which
>> compiler would be better (WATCOM c++ 11.0 or DJGPP 2.8). I read somewhere
>> that DJGPP and WATCOM are almost the same in optimization( except for
[...]
>
>The difference was small, and only visible on the Pentium. Now, with GCC
>2.8.x and PGCC, that difference is gone, AFAIK.
Watcom 11.0 is a turd, but 10.6 still beats out PGCC / GCC in optimization.
GCC is probably one of the least efficient compilers out there (Turbo C++
beats it in many respects), but it is what I use because it's free and
there's plenty of on-line tech support... =)
Later,
Matt.
- Raw text -