delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | mdruiter AT cs DOT vu DOT nl (Ruiter de M) |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: need help with LFN please... |
Date: | 8 Apr 1998 13:58:40 GMT |
Organization: | Fac. Wiskunde & Informatica, VU, Amsterdam |
Lines: | 12 |
Message-ID: | <6gfvqg$gq6$1@star.cs.vu.nl> |
References: | <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 980405153404 DOT 5976K-100000 AT is> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | sloep109.cs.vu.nl |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il) wrote: > LFN is virtually untested without Windows 95. I'm also told the LFN > TSR of NDOS is slow and buggy. I'm sure you mean DR-DOS or OpenDOS here. NDOS/4DOS are just command.com replacements and have nothing to do with LFNs directly. -- Groeten, Michel. http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mdruiter \----/==\----/ \ / \ / "You know, Beavis, you need things that suck, \/ \/ to have things that are cool", Butt-Head.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |