Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/03/12/03:00:21
On Fri, 06 Mar 1998 09:35:29 -0500, Charles Krug <charles AT pentek DOT com>
wrote:
>Nate Eldredge wrote:
>
>> In the case of C the canonical (and apparently quite useful)
>> one is Kerninghan and Ritchie's "The C Programming Language, Second
>> Edition." The standard C++ reference escapes me at the moment.
>>
>
>Stroustroup "The C++ programming Language" is quite good (and is the
>standard)--though it assumes knowledge of programming. I did once see a book
>that came with g++ compiled for DOS, but I can't recall the title.
assumes programming knowlege = C/C++ knowlege, or just knowlege in
general... like basic types, procedures, functions, algorithms,
etc.???
-----
Sanchez the Skiing Communist Cactus
ICQ: 8829627
ten DOT cirtnecnoc AT nrabeoj
(it's backwards if you really want to mail me w/ something relevant)
"The clinching proof of my reasoning is that I will cut anyone who argues
further into dogmeat."
--Sir Geoffry de Tournville
"While there is a lower class I am in it,
while there is a criminal element I am of it;
while there is a soul in prison, I am not free."
--Eugene V. Debs
"Everyone has to be a little crazy, otherwise the world's no fun."
--Joseph Barnett
- Raw text -