Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/03/08/07:36:40
On 8 Mar 1998, JReister wrote:
> make with the default argument runs fine, although the .exe's generated are
> much larger than the ones I downloaded.
That's because the distributed executables are stripped. Yours include
debug info. Try this:
strip gcc.exe cc1.exe cc1plus.exe
> When I do a make install, I get the following:
> C:\djgpp\src\GNU\GCC-2721>make install
> Syntax error
> Bad command or file name
> Bad command or file name
> Bad command or file name
> Bad command or file name
> rm -f cpp
> ln cccp cpp > /dev/null 2>&1 \
> || cp cccp cpp
> Ambiguous output redirect.
> make.exe: *** [cpp] Error -1
Children, don't try this at home! "make install" doesn't work in the
DJGPP port of GCC 2.7.x. These commands assume a Unix-like shell, and
will never work with COMMAND.COM, which is what you are trying to do.
I don't know about 2.8, but I think "make install" works there, although
you still will need to install the port of Bash and auxiliary tools.
> In the DJGPP mail archives, I found hints regarding problems with building
> DJGPP in Windows 95, but not a complete list of things to do.
Set LFN=n in the environment before running configur.bat.
- Raw text -