From:	tom burgess <tburgess AT drao DOT nrc DOT ca>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: [Q]Computing speed in C++
Date:	Thu, 05 Mar 1998 00:45:34 -0800
Organization:	BCTEL Advanced Communications
Lines:	11
Message-ID:	<34FE662E.1696@drao.nrc.ca>
References:	<34FCB769 DOT 42BEF1A8 AT gong DOT snu DOT ac DOT kr> <34FD3174 DOT 2401F904 AT gong DOT snu DOT ac DOT kr> <6dk947$kaf AT news-central DOT tiac DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	pntn02m03-166.bctel.ca
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Martin Ambuhl wrote:
> <too much to quote for short comment>

Nice benchmark work! Was curious whether removing the -m486 (not used
by original poster) made any difference. Answer: no, same results.
BTW, my results for Pentium 120 were (C) 22.75, (C++) 22.74, and 
(C++ SLOWMODE) 37.97. Moral: keep constructors out of tight loops.
Interesting that the relative penalty was much higher on my machine
than yours - a 486?

	regards, tom

- Raw text -