From:	James Undery <james AT ghoti DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: [Q]Computing speed in C++
Date:	Wed, 4 Mar 1998 12:36:56 +0000
Organization:	None unless you want to pay me
Message-ID:	<NhY3fDAorU$0Ewz4@ghoti.demon.co.uk>
References:	<34FCB769 DOT 42BEF1A8 AT gong DOT snu DOT ac DOT kr>
	<34FD3174 DOT 2401F904 AT gong DOT snu DOT ac DOT kr>
Reply-To:	ghoti AT nospam DOT demon DOT co DOT uk
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ghoti.demon.co.uk
MIME-Version:	1.0
Lines:	15
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

In article <34FD3174 DOT 2401F904 AT gong DOT snu DOT ac DOT kr>, Bum-Seok Hyun
<dominic AT gong DOT snu DOT ac DOT kr> writes
>In C code, I just moved variable definitions
>into the first line of the code.

Why, a fairer comparison of C and C++ is to compile the C as C++

>I don't think that makes musch difference between C++ and C.

Yes it does, or certainly would do with objects. 'j' would be
constructed (and destructed) 10000 times and 'k' 100000 times.
That said the C++ is still slower 22s (25s using your code) compared to
16s (on my system).
-- 
James Undery <james AT ghoti DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>  

- Raw text -