Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/02/25/06:45:24
"Rylan" (rylan AT intekom DOT co DOT za) writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I am writing an application that might benefit a lot form intensive
> optimisation. Using -O3 (or -O2 with various switches) does seem to help,
> but I'm thinking that Pentium opti's might be even better. Is it really
> worth it to go PGCC, 'cause I heard that lots of stuff is "broken" in PGCC,
> and, if I do go PGCC, will it really give me a noticeable speed advantage,
> if I use the PGCC libc too? Or will it be better so stick with standard GCC
> as far as reliability is concerned.
>
> Fanx in advance, please reply by mail if at all possible.
I would appreciate this information as well.
--
.*. Friendship, companionship, love, and having fun are the reasons for
-() < life. All else; sex, money, fame, etc.; are just to get/express these.
`*' Send any and all mail with attachments to the hotmail address please.
Paul Derbyshire ao950 AT freenet DOT carleton DOT ca pgd73 AT hotmail DOT com
- Raw text -