Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/02/24/21:45:42
From: | "Rylan" <rylan AT intekom DOT co DOT za>
|
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
Subject: | Is PGCC really worth it?
|
Date: | 24 Feb 1998 18:26:14 GMT
|
Organization: | The South African Internet Exchange.
|
Lines: | 15
|
Message-ID: | <01bd4150$afde1c00$LocalHost@default>
|
NNTP-Posting-Host: | pc25-01-p06.saix.net
|
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com
|
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
Hi all,
I am writing an application that might benefit a lot form intensive
optimisation. Using -O3 (or -O2 with various switches) does seem to help,
but I'm thinking that Pentium opti's might be even better. Is it really
worth it to go PGCC, 'cause I heard that lots of stuff is "broken" in PGCC,
and, if I do go PGCC, will it really give me a noticeable speed advantage,
if I use the PGCC libc too? Or will it be better so stick with standard GCC
as far as reliability is concerned.
Fanx in advance, please reply by mail if at all possible.
--
Spawned By Rylan
Is truth beauty or beauty truth?
- Raw text -