| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| From: | "Ron Aaron" <ron AT mrrrossbayeng DOT com> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.editors,comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| Subject: | Re: announce: VIM5 release "v" for DOS |
| Date: | Wed, 4 Feb 1998 12:27:02 -0800 |
| Organization: | Moss Bay Engineering |
| Lines: | 21 |
| Distribution: | inet |
| Message-ID: | <6baj0g$lbf@news.microsoft.com> |
| References: | <34D7E715 DOT 5719 AT primenet DOT com> <slrn6dg7dq DOT o1v DOT davep AT hagbard DOT demon DOT co DOT uk> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host: | 172.31.66.165 |
| To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Dave,
Dave Pearson wrote in message ...
>On 3 Feb 1998 20:46:00 -0700, Smith A. Cat <imbe AT primenet DOT com> wrote:
>
>> You should NOT use the DOS binary in Win95 except when rebooting into DOS
>> mode.
>
>Any reason why?
Yes:
a) because 16-bit exe support is not excellent under Win95
b) because long-file-names aren't supported in the DOS version
c) because the Win32 GUI version is much nicer to use under Win32
systems
d) because the 16-bit version has inherent limits on file sizes, etc...
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |