Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/01/26/02:53:43
At 11:31 1/25/1998 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
>On Sat, 24 Jan 1998, Nate Eldredge wrote:
>
>> Actually, I wonder if GCC should also be made to print an error message if
>> $DJGPP is not set.
>
>I don't think this is a good idea. GCC can work very well without
>$DJGPP if its built-in default directories are correct for the system
>where it runs. The message you suggest would indicate that this setup
>is somehow wrong. I think people should continue to be able to
>compile GCC with the pathnames of their liking and run the produced
>binaries with no error messages.
Okay, I didn't think of that possibility. Then maybe just the stock
distributed GCC binary should have this feature, since in it the built-in
directories can be assumed not to be correct. Then when people recompile GCC
to their liking, it can be set up not to do this. (Like an #ifdef that only
the maintainers set...)
I'm just trying to think of ways to cut down on the flood of "Cannot find
stdio.h. What!?!" postings from people too lazy to read documentation.
Nate Eldredge
eldredge AT ap DOT net
- Raw text -