Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/01/25/22:45:23
In article <34CAEB55 DOT 6CEC1041 AT thegrid DOT net>, elange AT thegrid DOT net says...
>
>I need to do some 32-bit programming under DOS, but not with DPMI
>compliance. So far, I have been doing all of my development using MASM
>6.11, because only an assembler gives me the flexibility I need.
>However, my development time is too long, and I need to develop an SDK
>for other users (my application is an OS-extender).
>
>I want to be able to develop in C/C++ for obvious reasons. But, all I
>need the compiler to do is generate 32-bit code under some set of
>assumptions. I also want the linker to allow me to replace all of the
>startup code, so I can load it any way I choose. Basically, I just need
>to know the compiler assumptions.
Why would you want to do this? Only real reason I can think of for replacing
the DJGPP startup code is so one could load some kind of virus-infested
startup code in it's place.....
- Raw text -