Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/01/25/04:31:02
On Fri, 23 Jan 1998, S. M. Halloran wrote:
> I checked a TC++ v3.0 copy for access(), and indeed you're right.
> Incredibly Borland did not define the constants with macros. What is
> more bizarre is that Borland indicated in its portability table that
> access() is portable with Unix.
`access' is portable, but the macros aren't. I guess, Borland just
wanted to be compatible with its competition, the MS C compiler.
> Is it the case that the earliest implementations of access() in Unix
> did, in fact, not use macro symbols?
Some of them do, others don't. I don't know whether those which don't
are earlier.
- Raw text -