Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/01/21/07:41:58
A.P. Zijlstra wrote:
>
> Chris Croughton wrote:
> >
> > Gili wrote:
> > >
> > > Where can I find the DOS binaries?
> >
> > You can't, until someone has built it. I don't have time
> > for at least a week, even if it builds first time (I don't
> > know how much of the DJGPP stuff has been transferred into
> > the GNU version, or how the configure and make will work
> > under DOS; the INSTALL file isn't very clear except that
> > you need DJGPP to build it with). Probably everyone else
> > is in the same state - it takes time to build and even more
> > to test.
> >
> > If it's urgent you could always build it yourself <g>...
> >
> > Chris C
> Hi,
>
> I tried to compile the gcc 2.8.0 sources under go32-msdos (DJGPP),
> with
> the current version of djgpp. That is a stabs-debug patched an cygnus
> repository patched gcc 2.7.2.1 and bin-utils 2.7 (havn't installed
> 2.8.1
> yet). the configure.bat file dosn't work, however the './configure
> --host=i386-go32-msdos --with-stabs --prefix=c:/gnu' bash script does
> (after installing most of the gnu unix utils that is :). I then edited
> the produced ./config.status to replace 'ln -s' with 'cp' and ran it.
> I
> then edited all produced makefiles (./makefile ./cp/makefile
> ./objc/makefile) to disable debug info in all objects (I havn't got
> enough disk space :< )
>
> after typing: ./make it runs for quite a while ( 486dx66, 20mb ram
> argh). But stops with an error in compiling libgcc2.c (line 1724,
oops. it was line 1726 (no data corruption !)
> includeing sting.h) on some syntax error.
>
> Is this my error, gnu's distributor or some other thingy I overlooked?
>
> please let me know if you know an answer to my problem,
>
> thanks
>
> Peter
some more specifics... in building libgcc2.a it iterates trough an for
loop in the makefile, compiling a bunch of object files from the same
file (libgcc2.c), every compilation has other defines (xgcc -DL${name}).
it trashes in the '_bb' section. I'm still trying to figure out what
exactly is going wrong as I assume the code is correct (I might hope it
acctualy compiles under most hosts especially real UNiX
implementations).
DJ,
I saw you already have the gcc 2.8.0 docs on your web-page, is that just
a quick texi hack. Or are you yourself busy building this compiler ?
All help appreciated :)
Peter
- Raw text -