Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/01/16/06:29:39
At 18.01 1998-01-13 -0800, you wrote:
>At 05:58 1/13/1998 -0500, Peter Palotas wrote:
>> -- [ Why isn't %p printed with a '0x' prefix ] --
> `p'
> A pointer. This is printed with an `x' specifier.
>
>I interpret that to mean that "%p" works just like "%x", which it does.
>
>In any case, the way a pointer is printed is considered
>"implementation-dependent". It is not necessary that DJGPP print pointers
>the same way as any other system. Of course, if you have a compelling reason
>you think it should, let's hear it.
Well, Linux does it that way for one, and DJGPP should be as compatible as
possible with Linux, don't you think?
-- Peter Palotas alias Blizzar -- blizzar AT hem1 DOT passagen DOT se --
*****************************************************
* A brief description of DJGPP: *
* NEVER BEFORE HAS SO FEW DONE SO MUCH FOR SO MANY! *
*****************************************************
- Raw text -