| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| From: | Victor jetten <jeten AT laon DOT inra DOT fr> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| Subject: | fixed or float 3D calculations on a pentium? |
| Date: | Wed, 07 Jan 1998 12:00:29 -0800 |
| Organization: | INRA |
| Lines: | 6 |
| Message-ID: | <34B3DEDD.F04C448C@laon.inra.fr> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host: | 192.93.98.129 |
| Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
| To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
I've been doing some 3D landscape respresentations using Allegro on a pentium 166, resolution 1024x768 with 256 colors. The fixed point version is slower than in floating point version (basic 3D calculations on gridcells). Is this because a pertium is faster in float ? How or when should fixed point be applied to make it faster? Thanks
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |