From:	Thomas Demmer <demmer AT LSTM DOT Ruhr-UNI-Bochum DOT De>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: hexidecimal confusion
Date:	Wed, 17 Dec 1997 07:43:45 +0100
Organization:	Lehrstuhl fuer Stroemungsmechanik
Lines:	28
Message-ID:	<349774A1.A36AD372@LSTM.Ruhr-UNI-Bochum.De>
References:	<677kii$qmv$1 AT newsfep4 DOT sprintmail DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	bvb.lstm.ruhr-uni-bochum.de
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Ionicis wrote:
> 
> Is there a difference between 16h and 0x16?  Can you use 16h instead of
> 0x16 for things such as interrupt specifiers (int86(16h, &regs,
> &regs))?  Or must you use 0x16?  Is there a difference between the first
> form and the latter form (C-wise, not value-wise)?  Some clarification
> on this would be greatly appreciated.
> 
> "Ionicis"
The first form is illegal, the second one is fine. 16h is sometimes
used in documentations and printed texts to indicate a hex number.
0x16 is what the C compiler understands. In PASCAL you would say
$16.

-- 
Ciao
Tom

*************************************************************
* Thomas Demmer                                             *
* Lehrstuhl fuer Stroemungsmechanik                         *
* Ruhr-Uni-Bochum                                           *
* Universitaetsstr. 150                                     *
* D-44780  Bochum                                           *
* Tel: +49 234 700 6434                                     *
* Fax: +49 234 709 4162                                     *
* http://www.lstm.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/~demmer                *
*************************************************************

- Raw text -