| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| From: | Dominique DOT Biesmans AT nospam DOT ping DOT be (please remove the nospam part) (Dominique Biesmans) |
| Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| Subject: | Re: Return Types for Constructors |
| Date: | Mon, 08 Dec 1997 18:58:36 GMT |
| Organization: | EUnet Belgium, Leuven, Belgium |
| Lines: | 24 |
| Message-ID: | <348c4260.323656@news.eunet.be> |
| References: | <01bd0366$cfe6d140$d744e4cf AT cadvision DOT com> <348BA5D2 DOT 503C AT rug DOT ac DOT be> |
| Reply-To: | Dominique DOT Biesmans AT nospam DOT ping DOT be (please remove the nospam part) |
| NNTP-Posting-Host: | dialup112.leuven.eunet.be |
| To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
>constructors always return void, so you should have written instead:
absolutely NOT!!! Constructors don't have a type
Please don't try to answer the question, if you're not familiar with
the subject, you only confuse people.
To the original poster : post your header declaration, otherwise
something like this should always work :
// declaration
class A
{
// ...
public:
A(): // default constructor
// ...
}
A::A()
{
// implementation
}
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |