Date:	Thu, 30 Oct 1997 17:37:54 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To:	Peter Palotas <blizzar AT hem1 DOT passagen DOT se>
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: FYI: speed of Allegro/DJGPP
In-Reply-To:	<3.0.16.19971030165412.282f0752@hem1.passagen.se>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.971030173107.5238A-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Thu, 30 Oct 1997, Peter Palotas wrote:

> >8MB is a borderline case.  The FAQ says to not use RAM drive for
> >machines with 5-8MB, but for those with more than 8MB it suggests a
> >2MB RAM disk.  With careful setup, a 8MB machine could well afford a
> >small RAM drive and get a performance boost.
> 
> What should one put on the RAMDrive in this case? I mean what will give you
> the largest performance boost? Putting GCC, CC1PLUS and those .exe files
> there, or using it as the TMPDIR?

It depends on what exactly is loaded at boot time (TSRs, device drivers) 
and what kind of jobs do you do most.  In general, I don't recommend 
putting the compiler into the RAM disk, since the .exe are large and will 
quickly exhaust the RAM drive.  Let the disk cache handle these.  TMPDIR 
should be the first candidate for the RAM disk, then the headers (if you 
compile a lot).

But having only 8MB means that you need to experiment and time your
real-life jobs to see which setup is best for you.  I don't think anybody
can give you a reliable advice based on hearsay.  That's why the FAQ
avoids saying anything specific for this borderline case (although I
myself had an 8MB machine for several years).

- Raw text -