delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/10/29/00:17:14

From: pdennis736 AT aol DOT com (PDennis736)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Alt-Tab slowdown running RHIDE under Windows 95
Date: 29 Oct 1997 01:39:54 GMT
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <19971029013901.UAA10106@ladder02.news.aol.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ladder02.news.aol.com
Organization: AOL, http://www.aol.co.uk
References: <Pine DOT LNX DOT 3 DOT 95 DOT 971028164323 DOT 1604C-100000 AT posaune DOT hrz DOT tu-chemnitz DOT de>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

In article
 <Pine DOT LNX DOT 3 DOT 95 DOT 971028164323 DOT 1604C-100000 AT posaune DOT hrz DOT tu-chemnitz DOT de>, Robert
 Hoehne <robert DOT hoehne AT gmx DOT net> writes:

>On 25 Oct 1997, PDennis736 wrote:
>
>> When running Rhide in a Dos box I find that any keyboard use involving the
>> Alt key becomes extremely slow. For example if pressing Alt+Tab there is a
>> delay before anything happens. This occurs on all windows applications
>> while Rhide is running and also applies to menu access keys (eg Alt+F for
>> the file menu) in all windows applications. The delay is very variable,
>
>What version of RHIDE you are using? If it is 1.3 then disable the
>'Show free memory' option from the preferences and see if this helps.

Of course I should have said that I'm using RHIDE Version 1.4 (Sep 30 1997). I
 did try the 'Show free memory' option without it making any difference.

However I have investigated a little and discovered that the problem is not
 with RHIDE per se, but rather it will affect any DOS program that sits in a
 tight loop waiting for keyboard input using the bios to check without waiting:

  const DELAY = 10000;

  while (bioskey(1) == 0)
    for (unsigned n = 0; n < 10000; d++);

interestingly, on my system if I set DELAY to be 60 or less then there is no
 slowdown at all, but go to 100 and immediately I will have to wait up to 10
 seconds for menus to activate in other windows applications.

Obviously a problem in Windows 95 or my setup at least, so I'll have to try a
 more appropriate group if I can be bothered. Perhaps I should be thankful
 that's *all* that's wrong with my Configuration :-)

Phil

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019