Date:	Mon, 27 Oct 1997 17:12:19 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id:	<199710280112.RAA17343@adit.ap.net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	Peter Palotas <blizzar AT hem1 DOT passagen DOT se>,
	ao950 AT FreeNet DOT Carleton DOT CA (Paul Derbyshire)
From:	Nate Eldredge <eldredge AT ap DOT net>
Subject:	Re: Need information !!!
Cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

At 10:11  10/27/1997 -0500, Peter Palotas wrote:
>>Yeah, there are symbol tables and debug info in there. Use strip, or
>>compile with -s, to get a smaller EXE when you have a final product and
>>are done debugging.
>
>Stripping debug information and whatever, using 'strip' often makes my
>programs give me a SIGSEGV. Is this understandable, or is it a bug that
>should be looked into? 
I think this has already been solved, and was traced to a bug in DJP. But
another caveat with `strip': At least with the `strip' from Binutils 2.7,
you can't strip a file that has been compiled with stabs debugging. It
results in a bogus binary and instant GPF's. I know that DJP 1.05 can handle
stabs-debugging files made with the 2.7 Binutils.

Nate Eldredge
eldredge AT ap DOT net

- Raw text -