Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: The future of Djgpp
Distribution:	world
From:	vischne AT ibm DOT net-nospam (root)
Organization:	The Light
References:	<6239qf$5ur AT mtinsc04 DOT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
	<Pine DOT GSO DOT 3 DOT 95 DOT 971015185926 DOT 1055A-100000 AT catbert DOT ucdavis DOT edu>
	<34458283 DOT 0 AT news3 DOT ibm DOT net> <upW1$CAeQhR0Ew3$@smgcia.demon.co.uk>
MIME-Version:	1.0
NNTP-Posting-Host:	32.100.34.175
Message-ID:	<3446efc0.0@news3.ibm.net>
Date:	17 Oct 97 04:55:28 GMT
Lines:	17
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

In article <upW1$CAeQhR0Ew3$@smgcia.demon.co.uk>, stuart AT smgcia DOT demon DOT co DOT uk 
says...
>
>>This is a problem now, since DJGPP 2 doesn't support the new Win95 file
>>names.  (To tell the honest truth, Win95 doesn't support the new file names
>>completely either.  Just do a lookup on a CDRom with long file names, and
>>see what it gets you.)
>>
>yes it does, if you add 
>
>+LFN=y
>
>to the /djgpp/djgpp.env file.

Thank you for the info.  Now, if Win95 would read long file names from a
CD Rom, we'd be in complete agreement.

- Raw text -