From:	Stuart MacGregor <stuart AT smgcia DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: The future of Djgpp
Date:	Thu, 16 Oct 1997 14:18:22 +0100
Distribution:	world
Message-ID:	<upW1$CAeQhR0Ew3$@smgcia.demon.co.uk>
References:	<6239qf$5ur AT mtinsc04 DOT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
	<Pine DOT GSO DOT 3 DOT 95 DOT 971015185926 DOT 1055A-100000 AT catbert DOT ucdavis DOT edu>
	<34458283 DOT 0 AT news3 DOT ibm DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	smgcia.demon.co.uk
MIME-Version:	1.0
Lines:	12
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

>This is a problem now, since DJGPP 2 doesn't support the new Win95 file
>names.  (To tell the honest truth, Win95 doesn't support the new file names
>completely either.  Just do a lookup on a CDRom with long file names, and
>see what it gets you.)
>
yes it does, if you add 

+LFN=y

to the /djgpp/djgpp.env file.
-- 
Stuart MacGregor

- Raw text -