From:	ao950 AT FreeNet DOT Carleton DOT CA (Paul Derbyshire)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Warning control. Is there more convenient way?
Date:	11 Oct 1997 21:43:58 GMT
Organization:	The National Capital FreeNet
Lines:	21
Message-ID:	<61oruu$6f8@freenet-news.carleton.ca>
References:	<AD7EoFq8hO AT rsuzi DOT pgu DOT karelia DOT ru>
Reply-To:	ao950 AT FreeNet DOT Carleton DOT CA (Paul Derbyshire)
NNTP-Posting-Host:	freenet3.carleton.ca
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

If you explicitly don't want to use the parameter foo in


void bar (int baz, int foo) {

}

Include the line at the start:
  (void)foo;

This does nothing, generates no runtime code, but tells the compiler you
deliberately included foo to conform to some signature but are not using
it in bar().

--
    .*.  Where feelings are concerned, answers are rarely simple [GeneDeWeese]
 -()  <  When I go to the theater, I always go straight to the "bag and mix"
    `*'  bulk candy section...because variety is the spice of life... [me]
Paul Derbyshire ao950 AT freenet DOT carleton DOT ca, http://chat.carleton.ca/~pderbysh

- Raw text -