From:	michael DOT mauch AT gmx DOT de (Michael Mauch)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Memory leak.
Date:	Mon, 06 Oct 1997 19:26:00 +0200
Organization:	Gerhard-Mercator-Universitaet -GH- Duisburg
Lines:	26
Message-ID:	<3439043e.32895652@news.uni-duisburg.de>
References:	<3 DOT 0 DOT 16 DOT 19971003101449 DOT 36e7aec2 AT hem1 DOT passagen DOT se> <613s4d$hrm AT dfw-ixnews3 DOT ix DOT netcom DOT com> <3435E44A DOT 5C65B10B AT alcyone DOT com> <3436785d DOT 8243393 AT news DOT uni-duisburg DOT de> <616g9n$i7 AT dfw-ixnews11 DOT ix DOT netcom DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ppp89.uni-duisburg.de
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

On 4 Oct 1997 22:34:31 GMT, firewind <firewind AT metroid DOT dyn DOT ml DOT org>
wrote:

> Michael Mauch <michael DOT mauch AT gmx DOT de> wrote:
> > sizeof is an (unary) operator, not a function, so 
> 
> >   x = sizeof int;
> 
> > is just as valid as 
> 
> >   x = +4;
> 
> Certainly not! Erik was correct; my lack of parenthesis around 'int' -was-
> a typo. Did you test code that does something like "x = sizeof int"? I
> garuntee that gcc will report:
> 
> whatever.c:x: parse error before `int'
> 
> Parenthesis are NOT required around a -variable- when the sizeof operator is
> applied, but they ARE required when it is being applied to a type name.

Yes, you're right. I didn't test it and `sizeof int´ really doesn't
work, whereas `char c; x = sizeof c;´ does. I'm sorry.

Regards...
		Michael

- Raw text -