From:	wogl AT pizpalue DOT mchp DOT siemens DOT de (Wolfgang Glunz)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	bug in tempnam ?
Date:	1 Oct 1997 17:07:56 GMT
Organization:	Siemens Inc.
Lines:	29
Distribution:	world
Message-ID:	<60u01c$dl9$1@salomon.mchp.siemens.de>
Reply-To:	Wolfgang DOT Glunz AT mchp DOT siemens DOT de
NNTP-Posting-Host:	pizpalue.mchp.siemens.de
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

A user of pstoedit (ftp://sunsite.cnlab-switch.ch/mirror/X11/contrib/applications/pstoedit/pstoedit.html)
tried to make pstoedit under gjgpp. Unfortunately the program did not run as expected.
Together we found out that there might be a bug in the c-library function tempnam (not tmpnam !).
Under all other systems I known, tempnam returns a pointer to newly allocated memory if
the first parameter is 0. Under djgpp 2.01 it looks like that tempnam behaves the
same as tmpnam which returns a pointer to a static memory which is overwritten after
each call to tmpnam.

The following program illustrates the possible bug;

#include <iostream.h>
#include <stdio.h>
 
int main()
{
 char * p1 = tempnam(0,"t1");
 char * p2 = tempnam(0,"t2");
 cout << p1 << " " << p2 << endl;
};
 

Normally one gets two different values whereas under
djgpp 2.01 p1 and p2 are the same.

	Wolfgang

-- 
Wolfgang Glunz            email: Wolfgang DOT Glunz AT mchp DOT siemens DOT de

- Raw text -