Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/09/23/05:46:51
Colin Walsh <cwalsh AT nf DOT sympatico DOT ca> wrote:
> Ive been watching the "which compiler is better" thread for a while now and
> have seen many articles mentioning optimization being a critical part
> of the compilers performance. Now, what if, someone here came up with a
> kind of "AI" (used loosely) optimizer for DJGPP? It could run after the
> normal optimizer and go through the code with the knowledge of an AT&T asm
> programmer and find things that the normal optimizer missed.
DJGPP does not and will -never- add things not already present in the stock
gcc.
> Now, Im not that good with assembly myself, nor artificial intelligence, but
> if some of us took enough interest in it we could have DJGPP/gcc making
> some of the best code out there and we can <french guy from Monty Python and
> the Holy Grail> fart in thier (the MSVC supporters) general direction!
> </french guy> :)
How about we fart in their general direction anyway? If you think MSVC is
great, by all means, switch. Personally, I'll stick with gcc.
late\fw
--
[- firewind -]
[- email: firewind AT metroid DOT dyn DOT ml DOT org (home), firewind AT aurdev DOT com (work) -]
[- "You're just jealous because the voices talk to -me-." -]
- Raw text -