delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | dmlloyd AT earth DOT execpc DOT com (David Lloyd) |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: 32bit DOS. |
Date: | 22 Sep 1997 20:17:55 GMT |
Organization: | Nope. |
Lines: | 15 |
Message-ID: | <slrn62dkjj.sse.dmlloyd@earth.execpc.com> |
References: | <Pine DOT SOL DOT 3 DOT 94 DOT 970915182420 DOT 28764A-100000 AT taz> <874456398 DOT 792858 AT smyrno DOT sol DOT net> <5vnons$2ps$1 AT vnetnews DOT value DOT net> <34268476 DOT 0 AT 139 DOT 134 DOT 5 DOT 33> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | earth.execpc.com |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
In article <34268476 DOT 0 AT 139 DOT 134 DOT 5 DOT 33>, Herman Schoenfeld wrote: >In article <5vnons$2ps$1 AT vnetnews DOT value DOT net>, mschulter AT value DOT net says... <Chop> >I don't think a new DOS is the right way to go. Perhaps a windows like OS which >could run MS-WINDOWS programs is the right heading. You know, you may be onto something there... Maybe a free, generic version of Windows is not such a bad idea, if it could be pulled off. Hmmm. - Dave
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |