From:	pjfarley AT dorsai DOT org (Peter J. Farley III)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: make 3.75 ported to DJGPP not handling correctly comments
Date:	Thu, 18 Sep 1997 02:14:00 GMT
Organization:	None
Lines:	16
Message-ID:	<34208d61.19606278@snews.zippo.com>
References:	<01INRBA1PE2W8WVYJI AT mail>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	news.newsdawg.com
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de> wrote:
<Snipped>
>Summing it up, this is not a make bug, it's a misinterpretation about
>whose duty it is to interpret the '#' here. 

*But* is that the correct definition?  Speaking as a relative outsider
to *nix environments, I must say it would *appear* to be the
responsibility of *make* to strip unquoted comments, since '#' is
*also* the *make* comment character.

Hmm-m-m.  But then, one could not pass an unquoted '#' to *any*
command.  At least a \# would always be required to do so.  Is that
the reason it is a misinterpretation?

----------------------------------------------------
Peter J. Farley III (pjfarley AT dorsai DOT org)

- Raw text -