Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/09/16/06:58:11
I would like this to be the final message posted on this thread. This
NG/mail list is for programming issues and questions related to DJGPP, not
arguments about better compilers.
IT is my hope that anyone who reads this, _please_ not reply anymore, or if
you feel you really must get stuck into them, do it by email only.
And people aren't even getting their facts straight anymore, which makes the
whole thing irrelevant anyway.
This guy Herman who seems to be having a great time writing everybody off is
not even brave enough to put a _real_ email address on it.
Sorry to add another useless message to the list, but I am hoping that it
will be considered and the thread will quickly die off.
Thanks
Brett
> >> Well, if you're going to be pedantic, WinNT, Win95, WinCE are 3 different
> >> OSs...
> >
> >Never mind, this is a minor point. (Which OS is just a matter of
> >libraries, not of generated code!!!)
>
> Yeah, that'll work. I'll just go download a Turbo C comms lib and use it on my
> linux GCC. You just keep at it, champ!
>
> >
> >Herman's point is that DJGPP and Watcom is great and VC++ sucks
> >so much that it takes a pentium 133 to equal the performance of
> >watcom on a 486!! I think reason tells us he's wrong.
>
> What reason would that be? The same that led you into believing its all a
> matter of libraries not code generated in portability.
>
> >Russ, you say that Quake II is made with VC++. Given that we
> >both know ID has use Watcom and could use it very well for OpenGL
> >programming, then Herman must be saying that ID Software people
> >are idiots. Hey, maybe GLQuake could run on a 386 if it used
> >Watcom? 8-)
> >
>
> Who ever said QUAKE II is going to be released in MSVC?
> I tire of you.
>
>
--
"Give me ambiguity or give me something else"
--
Brett Porter
blp01 AT uow DOT edu DOT au
http://www.geocities.com/CollegePark/Union/3596
Humour, Programming, and more.
- Raw text -