From:	Ron Natalie <ron AT sensor DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.lang.c++,comp.os.msdos.djgpp,rec.games.programmer
Subject:	Re: The numer 1 compiler, DJGPP or MSVC Here's a good rating comparision
Date:	Fri, 12 Sep 1997 11:02:11 -0400
Organization:	Sensor Systems
Lines:	22
Message-ID:	<34195973.3FAF@sensor.com>
References:	<3412BD25 DOT 1F30 AT mho DOT net> <5uuqci$15l AT sjx-ixn5 DOT ix DOT netcom DOT com> <34131883 DOT 29A3 AT mho DOT net> <341714E9 DOT F6CC2E67 AT rpi DOT edu> <34184FB9 DOT 441D AT cam DOT org> <34185990 DOT 3DFA AT sensor DOT com> <34189915 DOT 79BB AT cam DOT org>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	pro-one.sensor.com
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Vic wrote:
> > > this is a ridiculous statement. the majority of UNIXes is based on GCC,

> like? please tell me...I'm really curious. The compiler makers I know
> are Zortech, Borland, Microsoft ,FSF + maybe some others I don't know
> about (maybe I'm just ignorant, right?) but FSF (GCC) is the only one I
> know that makes a compiler for so many platforms (OH, OK, guys like IBM
> might make compilers for their own workstations or systems too)

For UNIX?  Intel for one (they also make a drop in code generator for
Visual C++).  Of course, my comments were to point out that the majority
of UNIXes do not run on X86 platforms.  Both UNIXWARE and SOLARIS market
their own compiler

> so please tell me, who is this company that makes a better compiler for
> so many "not so cheap PC based UNIXes" ?? I thought GCC was a standard
> in the unix world...

It's a standard for people who don't care to pay for a better one.
But UNIX (except for FREEBSD and LINUX perhaps) isn't BASED on GCC.
My definition of based is what system software is written in, not
what some random user might put on his machine.

- Raw text -