Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/09/11/07:47:41
Art S. Kagel wrote:
> Let me put the lie to this once and for all. Data
> General computers have used GCC & G++ as their official
> system compilers for several years. There are other
> hardware manufacturers that also pay for FSF to support
> their platforms also. So any commercial software
> developed for these platforms has been compiled
> with a "FREE" compiler, this includes software from
> Informix, Oracle, Sybase, Applix, Symantec, Computer
> Associates, etc.
And to my knowledge at least 3 of the major mobile
phone manufacturers use gcc native and cross compilers
for development and cross-compiling. Almost anyone
who uses Sun workstations uses gcc because the supplied
compiler is barely K&R (original) compatible (it's
designed only to be able to rebuild and relink the kernel
and drivers), which includes a number of engineering
sites.
And again from experience I know that a lot of expensive
'professional' compilers, especially those for embedded
systems, have very serious bugs. I know at least two
companies who went over to using gcc instead of the
proprietary compilers...
Chris C
- Raw text -