From:	Flavius DOT Vespasianus AT signature DOT below DOT d
Newsgroups:	comp.lang.c++,comp.os.msdos.djgpp,rec.games.programmer
Subject:	Re: The numer 1 compiler, DJGPP or MSVC Here's a good rating comparision
Date:	Thu, 11 Sep 1997 00:23:44 GMT
Organization:	AT&T WorldNet Services
Lines:	43
Message-ID:	<5v7du5$38j@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net>
References:	<3412BD25 DOT 1F30 AT mho DOT net> <3412DDA8 DOT C428AF45 AT a DOT crl DOT com> <341316EA DOT E14 AT mho DOT net> <34158665 DOT 8731090 AT news DOT concentric DOT net> <34148F08 DOT 7A16 AT pacbell DOT net> <5v5fm1$iku$1 AT vixen DOT cso DOT uiuc DOT edu> <5v76id$rn3 AT mozo DOT cc DOT purdue DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	207.116.56.15
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

In article <5v76id$rn3 AT mozo DOT cc DOT purdue DOT edu>, "Chris Lomont" <clomont AT omni DOT cc DOT purdue DOT edu> wrote:
> db <*bowlin*@*uiuc.edu*> wrote in article
><5v5fm1$iku$1 AT vixen DOT cso DOT uiuc DOT edu>...
>>1.)BC++ 5.02,Symantec C++ and Watcom C++ produce faster and smaller
>>executables than MSVC++ 5.0.
>
>Please post some  references for these claims. The results I've heard so far
>put MSVC 5.0 exe's faster and smaller than each of those other compilers.

This sort of comparison is generally bullshit. When people make claims like 
this

What is being tested?
What compiler switches are being used?

Generally magazines run bogus compiler tests that compiler developers know how 
to fake out.

------------------------------------------------
Doesn't the marketing person who decided 
"Windows 4.0" should be called "Windows '95" 
look really stupid right now?


Home Page:
http://home.att.net/~miano

Home of the Delphi Component Writers' FAQ

EMail Address:
|m.i.a.n.o @    |
|w.o.r.l.d.n.e.t . |
|a.t.t .| 
|n.e.t |


Full Name:
-------------------
-J.o.h.n?M.i.a.n.o-
-------------------

- Raw text -