Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/09/05/03:17:37
Michael Jara (mjara AT cadesm55 DOT eng DOT utah DOT edu) wrote:
: Strangely, it seems to somehow recover afterwards. I expected all of
: the following items read into memory to be corrupted because each read
: relies on the number of bytes read from the previous one, but this is
: not the case. I have no idea why!
Correction here. It was recovering on the small test database, but
not on the large one. This problem is throwing everything off! Help?!
--
_____ ___ ___ ___ ___ ______ __
/ | / || || |/ / | __| mjara AT eng DOT utah DOT edu \ \
/ |/ || || / | _] http://www.cs.utah.edu/~mjara \ \
/ /| || || \ | |____________________________________\ \
/___/ |____/ __||___||___|\___\|___________________________________________\
- Raw text -