Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/09/03/08:41:20
> Agreed, as I said earlier. (But you *did* mean to say "... as
> Makefile.in.in", didn't you?) Now, all we have to do is convince DJ
> that this is the way to go ... (I know, two chances, slim and none,
> right?) Hmm-m-m. Maybe we can all (or at least a few of us) chip in
> and buy DJ a copy of Win95 (just for development efforts, you
> understand, not to really *use*...<g>) so he could do that for we
> long-name folk.
A better option would be to volunteer to maintain the port yourself,
then you could do it however you wanted.
I *do* have Win95. I just don't like using it. Given a choice, I'd
rather cross-compile the packages from unix, which also supports long
file names but does it *right*.
DJ
- Raw text -