From:	Erik Max Francis <max AT alcyone DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: C++ overloaded operators and operator preceedence
Date:	Thu, 21 Aug 1997 19:27:27 -0700
Organization:	Alcyone Systems
Lines:	23
Message-ID:	<33FCF90F.2C04BFA4@alcyone.com>
References:	<199708191127 DOT UAA28352 AT sadecs DOT nexus DOT edu DOT au>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	newton.alcyone.com
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Tom Cook wrote:

>  Jeff Weeks wrote:
> 
>  > Alright, does anybody know if operator preceedence (or, order of
>  > operations) is preserved when you overload an operator in C++?
>
> Be warned, VC1.0 is OLD! This may have changed, but as far as I know
> it's
> still right.
> 
> Someone please correct me if this is wrong.

The simplest answer to his question would have been, "Yes."

-- 
       Erik Max Francis, &tSftDotIotE / email / mailto:max AT alcyone DOT com
                     Alcyone Systems /   web /
http://www.alcyone.com/max/
San Jose, California, United States /  icbm / 37 20 07 N  121 53 38 W
                                   \
   "Love is not love which alters / when it alteration finds."
                                 / William Shakespeare, _Sonnets_, 116

- Raw text -