Date:	Tue, 12 Aug 1997 15:09:31 +1100
From:	Bill Currie <billc AT blackmagic DOT tait DOT co DOT nz>
Subject:	Re: djgpp vs lahey fortran
In-reply-to:	<199708120236.MAA23398@solwarra.gbrmpa.gov.au>
To:	leathm AT solwarra DOT gbrmpa DOT gov DOT au (Leath Muller), leest96 AT dong DOT snu DOT ac DOT kr,
	djgpp AT delorie DOT com, eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il
Message-id:	<199708120314.PAA28935@teleng1.tait.co.nz gatekeeper.tait.co.nz>
Organization:	Tait Electronics Limited
MIME-version:	1.0
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 970811172617 DOT 7651J-100000 AT is>
Comments:	Authenticated sender is <billc AT blackmagic DOT tait DOT co DOT nz>

On 12 Aug 97 at 12:36, Leath Muller wrote:
> Symify should be more accurate IMHO in pinpointing the location of
> the FP error. I had a lot of trouble working out FP errors because I
> had large chunks of assembly statements throughtout my code... All

That's not the fault of symify; it's gcc's fault. If there's an error 
in the asm, gcc reports the last line of the asm block...

Bill
--
Leave others their otherness.

- Raw text -