From:	ao950 AT FreeNet DOT Carleton DOT CA (Paul Derbyshire)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: template classes with DJGPP
Date:	7 Aug 1997 07:01:21 GMT
Organization:	The National Capital FreeNet
Lines:	24
Message-ID:	<5sbrs1$k88@freenet-news.carleton.ca>
References:	<01bca10d$bb446600$0100a8c0 AT stefan DOT schimanski> <5s768v$n84$1 AT horus DOT mch DOT sni DOT de>
Reply-To:	ao950 AT FreeNet DOT Carleton DOT CA (Paul Derbyshire)
NNTP-Posting-Host:	freenet3.carleton.ca
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Makulik.Guenther T 27528 R 91-811 WS tx24 (makulik AT tf16 DOT mch DOT sni DOT de) writes:
> May be, I didn't try for myself. The problem could be either that you omitted
> the #pragma interface directive, or that you have to declare you implementations
> as inline explicitely.
> Try to write the implementation code inside the class definition.
> 
> BTW why are you defining a container class (if not for study purposes), use STL
> components. These will be much more reliable than your own implementations and
> provide a lot of standard container types. 
> I've not got it on my hand now, but if you're interested I can mail you where
> to find good documentation on STL on request. The headers and implementations are 
> already part of the DJGPP standard C++ environment.

Because libg++ is under the Library General Public Virus, and that makes
distributing the thing a real headache. (First you have to read the Virus.
Then pop a Tylenol. Then figure out what it means in terms of obligations.
Then pop three Tylenol. Then actually distribute the thing, adhering to
the Virus. Then pop a Motrin.)
--
    .*.  Where feelings are concerned, answers are rarely simple [GeneDeWeese]
 -()  <  When I go to the theater, I always go straight to the "bag and mix"
    `*'  bulk candy section...because variety is the spice of life... [me]
Paul Derbyshire ao950 AT freenet DOT carleton DOT ca, http://chat.carleton.ca/~pderbysh

- Raw text -