| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| From: | Elliott Oti <e DOT oti AT stud DOT warande DOT ruu DOT nl> |
| Subject: | Re: Volatile |
| Sender: | usenet AT fys DOT ruu DOT nl (News system Tijgertje) |
| Message-ID: | <33EA7D5C.7C21@stud.warande.ruu.nl> |
| Date: | Fri, 8 Aug 1997 01:58:52 GMT |
| Reply-To: | e DOT oti AT stud DOT warande DOT ruu DOT nl |
| References: | <33E8495B DOT 3EBC AT starnets DOT ro> <33E8B8A1 DOT 7A15746F AT alcyone DOT com> |
| Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
| Organization: | The Gauge Variance Promotion Society |
| Lines: | 13 |
| To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Erik Max Francis wrote: > > I don't believe volatile has any meaning with functions. I was under the impression that volatile in conjunction with functions prevents the compiler from carrying out certain optimizations within, like rearranging the order of operations. Useful for functions containing hand-optimized inline assembly. -- ------------ Elliott Oti --------------- ------------- http://www.fys.ruu.nl/~oti ---------
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |