Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/08/01/18:50:51
On Wed, 30 Jul 1997, A. Sinan Unur wrote:
> Nate Eldredge wrote:
> >
> > John M. Aldrich wrote:
> > >Art S. Kagel wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > BTW, I just wrote a little program to print out the maximum value of a
> > >> > 64 bit integer:
> > >> >
> > >> > 18446744073709551615
> > >> Unsigned. Signed that would be:
> > >> 9223372036854775807
> > >
> > >Showoff. :) But how can you read a negative number of bytes from a
> > >file? That was the implicit assumption in what I said.
> > ALL THIS IS MOOT. You can't even have a file larger than 2^32. DOS
> > (and I think Unix also) defines the file pointer as being 32 bits. So
> > there is no possibility to have more than a 4GB file.
>
> there are 64 bit unices. a year or so ago, there was an article in Unix
> Review (i think) discussing migration issues (32 -> 64 bit)
> --
> Sinan
>
There is a 64 bit unix. HP makes a version of HP-UX that is 64 bit,
and we have a DEC alpha at work that runs 64 bit. I've even heard rumors
of a 64 and 128 bit Win NT out there somewhere, but it sounds a little far
fetched to me. I have no idea what platform it runs on.
- Raw text -