Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/06/15/05:16:50
On Fri, 13 Jun 1997, Bob Kematick wrote:
> than fix the function. As it is now, clock() and rawclock() seem
> quite similar. Redundant perhaps.
No, not redudant. As far as I understand, `rawclock' is a
compatibility function, so you could port programs that use it to
DJGPP.
> > `rawclock' is not meant to be used as a randomizer, use `time' for
> > that.
>
> time() returns a large integer which is the total number of seconds
> since God knows when. One second resolution not so great in a fast
> running program.
See my other message in this thread about these issues.
- Raw text -